PARADIGMA KAUM PURITAN DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KEYAKINAN BERAGAMA INTERN SEKTE/MAZHAB BUDDHA DI INDONESIA

Warsito Warsito

Abstract


The emergence of puritan religious groups with a strong character, it will be forced to reexplore
the relationship between religion and pluralism. The group will remain ignorant of its
doctrines and opinions and assume that with this belief they will claim the most correct. Puritan
groups have variations in names and movements but their diversity of character has the same lines and
corridors. Puritan groups in Buddhism arise in large sects or sects in Indonesia such as the puritan
groups of the Indonesian Theravada Buddhist Council, Maitreya groups, Mahayana groups, Tri
dharma Indonesia, and others.
In this study using a qualitative approach (quality research) which reveals a phenomenon to
gain understanding with data in the form of qualitative data. This research is to find out the paradigm
of Buddhist puritans in a plural society that is by openly interviewing schools of Buddhism. In
qualitative research the source of data comes directly from what is experienced by researchers as the
main instrument, data embodied in words or images, pay more attention to process rather than results,
in analyzing data more likely to use inductive methods.
The results obtained show that there are different paradigms in Buddhism regarding the
emergence of puritans. The different paradigm followed by listening to responses from religious leaders
and youth in the school of Buddhism. After writing in this research, hopefully it will benefit to young
people, religious leaders, Buddhist communities and other communities in general.


Keywords


Paradigm, Puritans, Formation of Religious Beliefs, Intern, Sect, Buddhist

Full Text:

121-130 PDF

References


Arifin, Tajul. 2008. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.

Aritonang, Jan S. 2007. “Liberalisme Pemikiran Keagamaan (teologi) dalam Tradisi

Kristiani.” Jurnal Harmoni, Volume VI, Nomor 21.

Asri, M. Yusuf. 2010. “Hubungan Umat Beragama dalam Masyarakat Multikultural di

Kota Sukabumi.” Jurnal Harmoni, Volume IX, Nomor 36.

Bagir, Zainal Abidin dkk.2011. Pluralisme Kewargaan, Arah Baru Politik Keragaman di

Indonesia. Mizan Media Utama.

Bogdan, R.C., Biklen, S.K. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory

and Method. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Inc.

Hasan, Iqbal. 2005. Analisis Data Penelitian dengan Statistik, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kahmad, Dadang. 2009. Sosiologi Agama. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. 2005. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Kountur, Ronny D.M.S. 2007. Metode Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi dan Tesis, Jakarta:

PPM.

Qodir, Zuly. 2011. Sosiologi Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sugiyono.2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutiyono. 2010. Benturan Budaya Islam : Puritan & Sinkretis. Jakarta: PT. Kompas Media

Nusantara.

Zed, Mestika. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Sati Sampajanna journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.